In any bureaucracy, the people devoted to the benefit of the bureaucracy itself always get in control and those dedicated to the goals the bureaucracy is supposed to accomplish have less and less influence, and sometimes are eliminated entirely:
In any bureaucratic organization there will be two kinds of people: those who work to further the actual goals of the organization, and those who work for the organization itself. Examples in education would be teachers who work and sacrifice to teach children, vs. union representatives who work to protect any teacher including the most incompetent. The Iron Law states that in all cases, the second type of person will always gain control of the organization, and will always write the rules under which the organization functions.
Read the iron law. Understand the iron law. Memorize the iron law.
Why do law enforcement agencies agitate for stricter penalization of male sexuality? It’s because that serves the interests of the law enforcement agencies themselves. Bureaucracy always seeks to expand and grow more powerful, and sooner or later (usually sooner than later), the organization — like a self-summoning Artificial Intelligence unaligned with human interests — gains sentience and commences to pursue its own organizational interests, regardless of their pertinence or lack thereof to the stated mission of the organization. Law enforcement agencies in particular, and government agencies in general, benefit from the criminalization of male sexuality as it gives them that much more power, increased budgets, workforce expansion, etc.
Okay, so what can we do? Are we destined to have our sexuality illegal because the government seeks to expand indefinitely?
Firstly, as I myself have been trying to do by writing these blogs and so on, Male Sexualism needs to find ways to convince both civilians and the authorities that it’s in everyone’s interest to legalize our sexuality. A “win-win situation.” For instance, if sexbots are made legal, they can be taxed like all other goods, and government sure loves them taxes, now, doesn’t it? I’ve also been trying to argue that the economy should be transformed into a “pedonomy,” meaning that it’s in the interests of the free market to allow teenagers to freely sell sex through prostitution and pornography, and what’s good for the free market is ultimately good for the government as well: I predict that a full legalization of CP will make the CP industry as big as, or perhaps bigger, than the regular pornography industry; likewise, if teen prostitutes were legal, they would be way more in-demand (and thus could charge higher prices for their pussies, and thus would pay higher income taxes) than 18+ prostitutes.
Secondly, while Pournelle’s iron law is prevalent throughout society, it’s not the whole of the story. Ideology does matter, and if Male Sexualism becomes popular, especially among rich, intelligent, and powerful people, it could be possible to overcome the interests of various government bureaucracies and legalize our sexuality. It’s similar to alcohol and drugs: government agencies want to illegalize as much of it as possible, but some powerful people have adopted the cause of e.g. legalization of cannabis, and it’s through the networks funded by these powerful people that the cause of cannabis legalization has gained momentum and actually resulted in de-criminalization of cannabis in many places. Government bureaucracy is not invincible; with sufficient ideological determination, it is possible to overcome state tyranny and usher in civilian liberty. The nexus of power and ideology is the ideologically-motivated billionaires, who can actually get things done if they want to.
Well, in the meanwhile, lacking billionaires to back our meager 10-member-movement, we need to focus on appealing to people who are relatively “normal” (but extremely disaffected) and moving masses of them to our side. I’ve been trying to do that, but it’s pretty clear that I won’t succeed at this within the time-frame I set for myself (till early 2020) because of all the shit that’s happened. Y’know, there are other interesting ideologies besides Male Sexualism, and the primary reason I joined Male Sexualism aka the pro-male sexuality movement is that I was overcome with a “sense of urgency,” which perhaps was unwarranted – hard to tell! Now, if we had a manifesto, at least that could be considered an achievement, but we don’t have a manifesto, and it seems that most (but not all) members of our movement strongly take issue with our leader Eivind’s anti-fap position, so we’re kinda going nowhere as of right now.
Let’s face it: we don’t get along, we strongly disagree about plenty of issues, and many of the people we’re trying to help don’t like what we’re doing because they are pozzed cucked Feminists themselves.
You know whom specifically I have in mind when I advocate for the things I advocate for? Normal heterosexual men who have sex with horny girls or are otherwise sexually interested in horny girls. For example, the guy who was sentenced to 160 years in prison for consensual sex with a horny 10-year-old chick. Such men suffer under the Feminist tyranny, a tyranny which manifests in a multitude of ways, both sex-related and non-sex-related.
So, as for me personally, I had simply been an anti-Feminist years before I realized what Male Sexualism is and that I am one, and will continue to be anti-Feminist regardless of whatever happens with this Male Sexualism project. Surely, I’m not alone feeling this sentiment; all the “core” Male Sexualists are anti-Feminists.
And yet, we constantly have to deal with the “MAP community” and with other related communities who have zero interest in anti-Feminism, and whose only beef with Feminism — if, indeed, there even is one at all – is that it prevents them from “platonically cuddling with little boys” or whatever it is these people want to do. See, the boy lovers are trying to have their “LGBTP” thing (lol – it’s never gonna happen), while the girl lovers are often much worse manginas than some of our enemies! Honestly, if you tell me, “Women past age 13 do not sexually attract me at all,” I’m going to assume that you’re fucked up and a liability rather than an asset.
(By the way, I notice that I get along easier with regular homos than with pedo homos, since the functionality of the regular homos is much superior to that of the pedo ones, which lends empirical credence to the observation that clinical pedos really are neurologically messed up)
Determined, absolute, and unapologetic anti-Feminism has become wildly popular nowadays among young men — i.e. millennials and gen Z — so shunning explicit anti-Feminism in order to placate a tiny minority of freaks who make no more than 0.1% of the population is nuts. I’ll repeat my point: I want (relatively) normal men on my side, not a coalition of the brain damaged. I want to convert those men who oppose affirmative action for women, oppose the child support parasitism and the alimony parasitism, oppose modern rape legislation, oppose the whole “sex abuse” hysteria, and are basically hardcore “MRAs” who are fully woke about what’s happening with the gynocentrism and the rest of it; I want them to be my audience, my allies, and my colleagues, not a bunch of weird cucks.
Also, lately I’ve been attracting a lot of low IQ and hysterical comments, and that, too, upsets me; perhaps I should just close down the comments section here and be done with it. We’ll see.
To be honest, I’d prefer to see more “crazy but intelligent” people than all the dumb fucks I’m currently seeing. That’s why I appreciate Natahn Larson. Nathan is a crazy motherfucker, but he’s my nigga, because he is interesting and has a sharp sense of humor.