A lot of right-wingers are in league with the Feminists to ban porn. Despite being a chronic wanker (to porn) myself, I’m no longer upset about the prospect. In fact, if they actually do it, I may welcome the new reality.

Fact is, something like 10% of the entire internet is pornography. If the prudish right-wing maniacs and their misandric SJW counterparts — and all the control freaks in between — do to these 10% of the internet what was done to CP, you can bet that a lot of men would be mad, furious, and agitated. A total elimination and criminalization of all porn would snap men out of their slumber and docility.

It’s said, “Beware of what you wish for, lest it come true.” The fascist control freaks who salivate all over the idea of banning porn would do well to consider the application of that adage to their own designs. Right now, pornography serves as a potent soma that keeps men, particularly the involuntarily celibate, from exploding in rage en masse against the Feminist prison planet we live in.

To ban these 10% of the internet, and to penalize men for possessing 18+ pornography, you need to have a Big Brother-esque level of control over the population. That’s what modern fascists (both right-wing and left-wing ones) clamor for, and that’s what government agencies — being bureaucracies — are incentivized to advocate. The war against CP was only the initial blitzkrieg; the “real war” will be waged on all fronts against all pornography.

That’s the nature of the Puritan-Feminist singularity: the state seeks infinite power and control; Puritanism-Feminism increases the state’s power and control; therefore the state is incentivized to intensify Puritanism-Feminism ad infinitum. Orwell understood that, which is why the Inner Party in 1984 is looking for a neurological method to eliminate orgasms, and established the Junior Anti-Sex League. (I’d say that only Male Sexualists can grasp just how woke Orwell really was)

Sexual tyranny is the ultimate tyranny, and evidently, it is sexual tyranny that the Deep State seeks to implement – globally. A single Male Sexualist country would put the rest of the world, made up of sexophobic control freaks, to shame; which is why our enemies would fight tooth-and-nail to prevent the establishment of such a country. The pretexts used by our enemies vary — today it’s “preventing abuse,” tomorrow it will be “resisting degeneracy” — but the true end-goal is ever the same: ushering in an infinity of Puritanism-Feminism.

But our enemies are short-sighted. They think that they can ban all pornography, and then after a few years, perhaps a decade, the new status quo will be normalized. Wrong! If you sow the seeds of absolute tyranny, you shall reap the fruits of absolute chaos. Male sexuality is a force that must not be underestimated, yet that is exactly what our enemies do when they play the dangerous game of banning ever more expressions of male sexuality.

Pornography is a manifestation of the male orientation toward visual and auditory sexual stimulation; to see an attractive naked woman in sexual euphoria, and to hear the moans of her sexual delight – that is the apotheosis of sexual gratification for normal, heterosexual men. To prevent men from accessing that through the screen is to compel men to take real-life action, action in meatspace, as well as internet action, action in webspace, to steer society in a Male Sexualist direction. Such “actions” would necessarily be unpredictable and not bound by the dictates of conventional morality.

Today, pedohysteria is the most salient aspect of Puritanism-Feminism. Pedohysteria provides employment for a lot of people, primarily those at the LEAs. And any kind of mass-panic is good for those who seek to expand their power at the expense of civil liberties. If people ask me, “Why do you believe that the FBI, the NSA, and the CIA are behind pedohysteria?”, all I have to do is retort the question: cui bono? Ordinary citizens have absolutely nothing to gain from the witch-hunt against men who possess CP (the “sinister pixels” as I jokingly refer to it) or who have sexual relations with teenagers. Ultimately, the only force that benefits from pedohysteria is the force of tyranny.

But, even from the perspective of FBI-NSA-CIA, the 1984 model is inferior to the Brave New World model. In the long-term, that is. Sexual tyranny produces friction, while sexual contentment reduces it. When everything goes “smooth,” there is by far less hostility towards living in a prison planet. Give people all the sex they want, all the drugs they want, and the right to associate with (and avoid associating with) whomever they want, and you won’t have to deal with so many unruly citizens.

But instead, you chose 1984 on steroids. Now, sure, a few lone-wolf terrorists won’t do much harm to the system, and are probably conducive to its power expansion; but what you, the Deep State, will always have to worry about is ideological disruption.

Banning pornography completely will start the count-down to a tumultuous worldwide ideological disruption. People will rebel. Men will rebel. Male Sexualism will gain dozens of millions of adherents within a few short years. You may silence me, you may silence my comrades – but ironically, it will be your own totalitarian policies that will ignite the fire of a Male Sexualist revolt.

Problem?